On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:58:17 -0800 (PST), Turnpike Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > someone at RH may have to expand on this, but I've heard of satellite "onsite" > RHN servers... meaning, you have one of your own, however, I'm also thinking 8 > production RHEL boxes isn't enough to justify a satellite... just thoughts to > go on. > > laters, > David McD. >
This is a scenario that I don't think is well thought out at the Red Hat camp. I'd suggest using CentOS on those internal machines and set up a local YUM repository to keep them up to date. If you do that, please send in your suggested donation so that the bandwidth costs can be defrayed. They got hit big when CentOS 3.3 came out a few months ago. Ended up with a $1500 ISP bill for the month. -- Joseph Tate Personal e-mail: jtate AT dragonstrider DOT com Web: http://www.dragonstrider.com -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
