On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Steve Litt wrote:

> RH5.2 was SWEET! Almost bug free, tiny footprint (by today's standards). If 
> the box is standalone, and not connected to any network, then security isn't 
> an issue, and 5.2 is excellent for memory, CPU and disk starved handmedown 
> equipment.

Agreed.  6.2 was great as well.
 
> I have the ISO, so I can make myself a copy at will, but I'd highly recommend 
> it for others.

You can also download the ISOs and install trees from ftp.redhat.com.  
They don't delete old versions.

Jeremy

-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer        [EMAIL PROTECTED]      trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
-- 
TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
TriLUG PGP Keyring         : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc

Reply via email to