On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Tanner Lovelace wrote: > However, switching to Cyrus would have several changes that > users would notice. Here they are: > > 1. In our current IMAP server setup, you can have folders at the > same level as INBOX. Under Cyrus all folders must be "under" > INBOX. > 2. In our current IMAP server, a folder can either contain messages > or other folders. In Cyrus a folder main contain both. > 3. The Cyrus server would support public folders (i.e. we could > direct the trilug mailing list to a public imap folder and give people > access to it. > 4. Procmail and Cyrus can coexist, but it is a hack and we would > probably want to encourage people to move from procmail to sieve. > (This probably wouldn't be as bad as it sounds, though, since > procmail with our current server is also a hack, and one based > on an original hack for Cyrus.)
I would prefer to have procmail still available. My procmailrc is 295 lines long; I do a LOT of things with it. The INBOX. prepend to the IMAP namespace for folders seems like a decent workaround, as all of my folders are at the top level, none are "underneath" INBOX (since you can't even do that with UW-IMAP). Jeremy -- /---------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \---------------------------------------------------------------------/ -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
