Some casual secondary research seems to indicate that of the more common Linux journaling filesystems:
- XFS is incrementally faster than ext3 - ext3 is notably faster than Reiser Does anyone on list have any practical experience with either benchmarking them (and if so, what was your application to benchmark them?) or have any hands-on commentary about any stability differences or other potential drawbacks of using XFS over ext3? I've got no experience with XFS, but in my estimation, if it works, it should be pretty transparent. In my estimation, if you notice your filesystem, something's amiss... Feedback is appreciated. Thanks in advance -- Shane O. ======== Shane O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==================== -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
