First, thanks to all that helped, esp. Aaron, Kevin, and Ryan.

The error was in fact NOT on the DNS server. It is setup correctly. However, I had to add Samba as a DNS Proxy (Thanks Kevin!), turn off spanning tree (Thanks Aaron!) and I found some errors in the protocol.ini and the system.ini files. We moved the operation from one domain to another, and this was not corrected in the system.ini files. Also, the drivers in the protocol.ini's were not correct either. This coupled with the errors above caused some major head aches. But with TriLUG's help and a little bit of determination, we were able to get this up and running.

What's really cool is it runs better than the old domain that was a NON-Linux DHCP/DNS server. :)

All in all, a good time was had by all!

Thanks again guys!

Aaron Joyner wrote:

Roy Vestal wrote:

Thanks Aaron, the spanning tree was the issue.

Now a follow up question: So on this same dos setup I have multiple Windows servers with 2 nics, the first nic is on the REAL network, the second on this private in question. If I try to do a net use g: \\servername\share, it says "the computer name specified is not found in the network path cannot be located". My boot process mounts one server as a drive but manually it doesn't. I've looked through the autoexec.bat on this and I don't see anything that would cause this. I've even put "hosts" and "lmhosts" in a dir that's on the path to no avail.

Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this part?


As Ryan basically pointed out, this isn't really a DNS issue it's a Netbios issue. DOS machines don't use DNS for name resolution, they use Netbios (Lanman) name mappings on the local network. Unfortunately, I have very little experience with Netbios in DOS, and have little desire to acquire any more experience in said field of "expertise". Having said that, the basics are that it's a broadcast protocol that attempts to locate other hosts by name. If you're not on the same broadcast domain, you need a hard mapping (like the lmhosts). If you're with in the same broadcast domain, it should "just work". I'd go with Ryan's suggestion, or perhaps further experimentation / googling on the lmhosts file.

Best of luck!
Aaron S. Joyner

--
TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
TriLUG PGP Keyring         : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc

Reply via email to