> > > The real reason may well have to do with the threat that Openwrt and > > the like pose to Ciscos business model, since lots of WRT54s with FOSS > > software replacements seem to be displacing more expensive Cisco boxen > > in commercial applications. > >
I disagree 1000%. When you boot an AP-1200, apply layer up layer of VLANs, RADIUS auth, as well as a 1000+ line tftp booted text config (though it can all (or most) be done via the web config) plus TACACS and every other protocol found in a true enterprise network you will know that a WRT54G running OpenWRT would NEVER be able to handle the load nor should it have ever been asked to do so. Linksys = home or SMB (look at Cisco's link roadmap and VoIP products announced recently) Cicso= Enterprise (or anywhere untested, unproven code should be deployed). Greg -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
