And, so, curiosity got the best of me and I looked it up...ignore my /proc recommendation.
http://linux-ip.net/html/tools-ip-route.html#tools-ip-route-flush-cache Evidently, I'm old school. Then again, there's no school like the old school. Shane O. On 1/10/06, Shane O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, you might verify the problem by using both ping (as provided by > OS) and fping (as provided by http://www.fping.com/). It seems that > one relied on the kernel's cache and one didn't. > > You're getting into some murky areas here--areas that a networking > class would likely not help too much (assuming you know the basics > about how ping/ICMP work...) > > Shane O> > > On 1/10/06, Ron Joffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 12:38, Brian Henning wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > Just wondering if someone could shed some light on why it seems that > > > some tcp utilities seem to ignore the kernel routing table. For > > > example: (Sorry about the wrapping..) > > > > Could the problem be on the remote end. The packets might be getting there, > > but might not know how to route back to your box. > > > > Is this a vpn or tunnel that you have set up with forwarding from 1.124 to > > the > > 192.168.10.0 network? > > > > Ron > > > > -- > > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ > > > > > -- > Shane O. > ======== > Shane O'Donnell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ==================== > -- Shane O. ======== Shane O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==================== -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
