OK, so I took your advice and wiped my bayes_* files from $HOME/.spamassassin. Within a about an hour, I rec'd 4 messages that were NOT marked as spam. I took one of them and ran it through spamassassin manually (-t), and it does believe it to be spam. Any idea as to why it didn't mark it originally? I've attached the output if you have a moment to peek at it.
-- Paul @ Thy Service > Paul G. Szabady wrote: >> During the last week or so, it seems like spam is bypassing my >> spamassassin filters quite a bit. I've double-checked my setup and all >> appears to be running as it should. Has anyone noticed this or am I >> just >> an anomaly? >> >> Two systems, same issue: >> - FC2, 2.6.10-1.771_FC2, spamassassin-2.64-2.1.legacy, >> sendmail-8.12.11-4.6 >> - CentOS 4.1 - 2.6.9-11.EL, spamassassin-3.0.1-0.EL4, sendmail-8.13.1-2 > > One more thing. Pull out a couple of the spam messages that are getting > through and run them through 'spamassassin -t < spam.msg' and examine > the output for clues why they aren't getting caught. If your bayes DBs > are messed up it will have a downscore because of being ham. > > --[Lance] > > -- > Celebrate The Circle http://www.celebratethecircle.org/ > Carolina Spirit Quest http://www.carolinaspiritquest.org/ > My LiveJournal http://www.livejournal.com/users/labrown/ > GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9 > CACert.org Assurer > -- > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ >
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
