I fully understand your feeling on Google going with WINE. People seem to forget is that despite the whole "do no evil" thing, Google is a publicly traded company. Doing the development as native application for Linux would either be more expensive or be waaay off in feature parity with the Windows implementation. Its not *all* about the almighty dollar, but it does factor high!
On 2/25/06, Matt Pusateri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, so this is slightly old but I just got around to ranting about it. > > Normally Google does things in a top notch manner, but I have to admit > that I was dissapointed in Google working with Codeweavers to release > Picaso for Linux as a Wine implementation. While I like to see Google > partnering with Codeweavers as it will only help the Wine API, it just > seems like Google could of done it better. I think they should have > rewritten Picaso as a Linux app and not just worked to make it run > under Wine. Okay, I'm done ranting for today. > > > Matt P. > > -- > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ > -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
