hoghhoughhoo - obviously, then, the signal needs more power!
(apologies to time allen) On 5/22/06, Tanner Lovelace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/22/06, Warren Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > now that would be a sight: 1.21 gigawatts of wireless internet connection > > woohoo! you could reach around the world and back again :) Actually, you couldn't. The 2.4GHz signal is much higher than frequencies that are reflected by the iononsphere and travel around the world. You could, however, probably get that signal to the moon and beyond! :-) Cheers, Tanner -- Tanner Lovelace clubjuggler at gmail dot com http://wtl.wayfarer.org/ (fieldless) In fess two roundels in pale, a billet fesswise and an increscent, all sable. -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
-- http://warrenmyers.com "God may not play dice with the universe, but something strange is going on with the prime numbers." --Paul Erdős "It's not possible. We are the type of people who have everything in our favor going against us." --Ben Jarhvi, Short Circuit 2
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
