On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Jason wrote:
that and the ipsec rfc is loosely interpreted by various vendors..
Sorry - I didn't pose my question real well. I should have
said
"when the wifi people first decided on WEP (and later WPA),
why didn't they all say instead 'we're going to use the
foobar version/implementation (or our implementation) of
IPSec'?."
I mean IPSec already existed and instead they chose the
dreadful hack of WEP. I understand that WPA needs encryption
hardware on the wifi card to handle the extra processing.
With IPSec you could have left the CPU to do it. With both
WEP and IPSec you have to enter a key and I can't imagine
that setup would be much different for Joe and Jane Public.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
