It was samba3 on both my linux samba server (the one used as a PDC)
and my OS X server.
I'm not sure what the minor version numbers are/were.
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samba3 or Samba4? I believe it was Samba4 that was supposed to support
it.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lee Fickenscher
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:16 AM
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] TCO - Linux, UNIX, and MS
On Aug 2, 2006, at 8:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember seeing something a while back about using SAMBA as your
DC.
While I haven't played with it ...the concept seems pretty neat.
I've used samba as a PDC before. It worked flawlessly. But that is
basically an NT4 domain. Last time I actually checked the samba docs
couldn't act as an active directory master. In reading the docs for
OS X
server, it seems that it can act as a active directory master and
since
it uses samba and openLDAP I'm guessing that the same can be done on
linux now.
-Lee
--
TriLUG mailing list :
http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/
trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
