Ian Kilgore wrote:

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:04:21PM -0400, Brian McCullough wrote:
You are on your LAN, with a private IP, 192.168.123.456,
Well, there's your problem.

/me runs
Yeah, I'm glad I'm not the only one who was cringing at those .456 and .789 IP addresses. :)

So this post isn't entirely useless - my gut instinct is that the problem is related to the "u-turn" problem as described, but I'm at a loss to explain precisely the internals of why. Assuming the NAT implementation is anything close to *sane* on the embedded router, this really shouldn't be a problem. Then again, don't trust the Chinese or Korean guy who wrote the firmware to have done a sensible job on his first programming project. The short version of the solution would be "don't do that". Use a Linux firewall, setup split DNS views, and that way the traffic isn't doing anything foolish, and if it does, it's going through a sensible iptables implementation that can deal with it. But maybe that's just me. :)

Aaron S. Joyner
--
TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/

Reply via email to