[email protected] wrote:
> How about mplayer? Why is that not included? I think that the excuse
> that it can use binary codecs, and that they provide them on their
> website is a rather weak excuse to not include it. Mplayer has been
> included in the Debian repos for quite sometime now and I consider it to
> be the best video player around for GNU/Linux, certainly beats VLC in
> performance.

Current FSF position seems to be that we list VLC but not mplayer in
directory.fsf.org. The reason we do not list mplayer are below (from
Kelly, our directory maintainer); this rejection was verified by rms on
10/24/2008. So someone may want to look to see if anything has changed
since then.

There are the parts of the README that invite the user to download
binaries.

"MPlayer can play most standard video formats out of the box and almost
all others with the help of external codecs."

"The GUI needs at least one skin and codec packages add support for some
more video and audio formats. MPlayer does not come with any of these by
default, you have to download and install them separately."

"MPlayer has builtin support for the most common audio and video
formats. For a few formats no native decoder exists and external binary
codecs are required to handle them, for example newer RealVideo variants
and a variety of uncommon formats. This step is not mandatory, but
recommended for getting MPlayer to play a broader range of formats.
Please note that binary codecs only work on the processor architecture
they were compiled for."

-- 
Daniel JB Clark   | Sys Admin, Free Software Foundation
pobox.com/~dclark | http://www.fsf.org/about/staff#danny

_______________________________________________
Trisquel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-users

Reply via email to