I've installed LXDE with Synaptic tonight.
In the list of installed packages, I see 'openbox', 'openbox-themes' and
'obconf'... (in lxde-core too)
Add 'obmenu' and you'll obtain the complete list of packages of Openbox!
I think that you need openbox and openbox-themes to get windows decorations
with LXDE.
In the other hand, LXDE installs Leafpad too. IMO, Leafpad is a *very* basic
text editor.
To be honest, I'm going to explain what I'll do when Trisquel Mini will be
released (if it is released with lxde)
1. "Oh! gdm is too weighty for me":
apt-get remove gdm --> apt-get install lxdm
2. "Oh! leafpad is too basic for me":
apt-get remove leafpad --> apt-get install geany
3. "Oh! there is alreadey xterm installed by default":
apt-get remove lxterminal
4. "Oh! there is already openbox, openbox-themes and obconf installed":
apt-get remove lxde --> apt-get install obmenu
To summarize:
LXDE | Openbox
gpicview | gpicview
leafpad | geany
lx-appearance | lx-appearance
lxde-common | lxpanel
lxde-core | obconf
lxpanel | openbox
lxsession | openbox-themes
lxterminal | pcmanfm
obconf | xarchiver
openbox | xscreensaver
openbox-themes | xmms2
pcmanfm |
xarchiver |
xscreensaver |
xmms2 |
Where is the "mini" one ? Left or right?
I don't want to argue with you and be sure I'm not angry ;-)
I simply don't understand why it's so easy to maintain LXDE and so difficult
to maintain Openbox.
When I see the work made for the main version of Trisquel with a big desktop
environment like GNOME, I don't understand what the difficulty represents the
integration of Openbox.
To quote your previous answer, I think that LXDE *is* the exception...
But who am I to say things like that ?
PS: please, excuse my bad english again
