> Sure there are benefits through translation etc. But you can't be > seriously telling me, that having a _game_ untranslated is an ethical > issue, because someone has to learn English to play it?
I don't agree that "a work of art should not be changeable" for at least some works of art. In this case it's not a problem, and it would be good if someone learns English to play a game. > My point is, games aren't works of general use and if they are non-free > software it doesn't do the kind of damage that happens, if every other > piece of software is non-free. In fact it doesn't do damage at all, it's > just a minor inconvenience. The whole moral issue isn't there. But is it > more convenient if the game is free software? Yes of course, but it's > only about convenience here, nothing else. My point is that games consist of software and data, and the software part should be free while there are different issues for data.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
