It's been that way for a while though. Perhaps they've fixed the license problem by now. If so, all we'd have to do to be able to include it in Trisquel would be to have it only recommend free plugins.
According to http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Software_blacklist#chromium-browser,
there are two problems: that the license information for some files is
unclear, and that Chromium recommends non-free plugins.
- [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG codecs consi... Teg Skywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG cod... adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG cod... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG cod... akirashinigami
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG cod... mithrandiragain
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FF... adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG cod... adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FF... akirashinigami
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FF... sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG cod... 1749408006
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Chromium and its FFMPEG cod... lhaooen
