> What you say is correct, except that easy_install/pip are pretty much > in the same category as aptitude.
I.e. they are programs using some external database to find packages to install. There is no problem in easy_install or pip other than possibly using PyPI as default package index. > How is > > sudo pip install module > > (module is non-free) any different? Is it because it's not on > Trisquel's repos? In that case, why not leave in the link code that > Mozilla puts in Firefox regarding Adobe Flash. It's not on Trisquel's > repos and it would leave the decision up to the user. There is a difference -- Mozilla visibly asks the user to install the plugin even if they didn't plan to (e.g. just visiting a random site), while easy_install/pip do it when the user asks them to do it. After reading the FSDG again I agree that PyPI shouldn't be used by default in free distros. The specific sentence at http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html: > Nor should the distribution refer to third-party repositories that are > not committed to only including free software; even if they only have > free software today, that may not be true tomorrow. Making a package index listing only FSDG-compatible packages and using it instead of PyPI would solve this problem, and would not make sharing free Python packages more difficult (assuming other package developers want to use it).
pgpm4PFArQqcc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
