On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:35:12 +0200 (CEST), [email protected] wrote: > Probably for situations like this one, where someone wants to run a fully > free system, but can't because something doesn't work. It's better than
> installing something entirely proprietary. Then you might wanna avoid the vendor that supplies those devices instead of getting into the dilemma. Free Software might remain free as in freedom and free from non-free subjugating features. That's why i see no point of giving a step backwards software freedom. -- Luis A. Guzmán García http://ark.switnet.org ¡Se Libre! -- http://fsfla.org/selibre/ The Hardware Database Project -- http://www.h-node.com Distribuciones libres de GNU/Linux -- http://ur1.ca/3e8gu
