What do you mean by "only a subset of the x86 architecture is fully open"? Are there instructions that only Intel and its partners (Microsoft) knows about?

Second question: what on earth is "copyleft hardware"?! Do you have a copying machine that duplicates computers?

The Free software movement is about freeing the users. Not the other developers. As a user I want to know how to use the hardware (for instance, to respect its users, the video card makers must detail how their cards must be used, the best way to do so is releasing their drivers under a Free software license). Nevertheless I do not need to know how to build the hardware because I cannot build it myself. The required technology is far too expensive. If one day, we have copying machines for hardware (the 3D printers are the first step in that direction), the users will need the four freedoms of Free software to be translated into the physical world. Until then, they cannot exercise them. Therefore I believe requesting them is irrelevant.

NB: I am voluntarily provocative because I really would like to understand the ethical issues addressed by the so-called copyleft-hardware.

Reply via email to