Debugging a microkernel is very hard and explains why the HURD is still far from being usable in production. The GNU project did not know that when the technical architecture was chosen.
Until now, the advantages of a microkernel are more theoretical than real.
Anyway it is true that with processors that may, in the near future, have
hundreds of cores, Linux may go through scalability troubles. I doubt the
number of drivers is an issue though (do you have any reference?): Linux is
monolithic but highly modular too.
- [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel going to be releas... mitja
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel going to ... akifo
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel going to ... ninenine78
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel going to ... gymnarchusniloticus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel going to ... Igor . Zobin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel going... gymnarchusniloticus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel g... Igor . Zobin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel going to ... adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel going... Igor . Zobin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is GNU Kernel g... magicbanana
