The question is in the other way around: what would be the advantage for a
user/developer to choose to receive the code under the GPL? If you choose the
MIT license you can relicense the code under the GPL! So it looks to me that
distributing the software under the MIT license only would not change
anything.
- [Trisquel-users] Dual License? lev . lazinskiy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Dual License? mornealberts
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Dual License? tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Dual License? adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Dual License? tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Dual License? magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Dual License? coachfactory53
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Dual License? lev . lazinskiy
