On 03/03/2012 12:06 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Why don't stay on Gnome 2? This desktop doesn't look pretty!
Thought I'd give an opinion: I think Unity 3D and 2D is really good.
Also, a lot of the bugs I found in Unity 3D weren't there in 2D.
After much time using Unity I find the gnome 2 app menu difficult to
navigate compared to typing the name of the program you want to run in
Unity.
I like Gnome shell as well, not so much the Gnome 3 fall-back... Or at
least I certainly prefer Unity 2D to the fall-back. The fall-back feels
too much like a second thought to me.
In any case, whatever choice Trisquel makes, I'll be happy with it! :-)
People can install their own interface if they are not happy. I'd be the
first to install something else if I'm not happy, but criticizing
Trisquel or any other distribution for its default interface seems
counterproductive to me and those unsolvable debates always seem to hurt
a distribution... Does anybody share this point of view?
