Remember that H264 raises patent threats: in the future, the developers of a free codec may go into legal troubles and a distributor may not be allowed to ship it. That is why it is preferable to not rely on such formats and use patent-unencumbered codecs such as that of WebM or Theora. Nonetheless this does not have anything to do with copyright and a free software implementation of a codec... well, is free software!
The default install of the current Trisquel decodes H264. There is no reason
for Trisquel not to ship a Web browser that would read it.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after... alonivtsan
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 a... alonivtsan
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Firefox may support H264 ... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after... adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 a... tegskywalker
