Trisquel's technical benefit would be it doesn't include these non-free components so you know where at least some problems will likely arise going forward had you chosen a non-free distribution (particularly in relation to support for hardware- although as Adobe and Oracle have shown this applies to critical software components too). In any case Trisquel makes it easy to select the right stuff the first time around.
Nobody here is going to recommend installation of a non-free driver/firmware
or help you with it. The primary benefit of Trisquel is freedom. If you are
really following the free software philosophically rather than the "open
source" philosophy the non-free "option" isn't an option. If you are going to
go this route there are other distributions you would go to instead. Most
distributions are largely free although problematic for technical (and
ethical) reasons related to non-free software.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orient... Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orient... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice dave . kirkby1975
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice TralfamadorianOrator
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Orientation Advice magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice lobikfilip
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice dave . kirkby1975
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice lobikfilip
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Orientation Advice dave . kirkby1975
