> Its cute to make little to no money when you are living at home or a student > at a university developing code. Its when the costs of living and raising a > family kick in and priorities change quickly. That is of course if you want > to make a living being a software developer for which RMS has said that it is > > unethical and we are all better suited being factory workers in his non > capitalistic viewpoints. That statement was taken from his Linux Action Show > interview.
The following is my personal opinion: Costs of living are not an argument for mantaining unethical jobs. Those jobs are an error of the system. But here you have a more capitalistic idea: If free software is doing most of the work, just being developed by people without needs as you say, or at any case, it will remains always cheaper because of the lack of need of writing everything again, why should those evil companies be paid for making propietary software? But this is the Trisquel forum, and no matter which is the opinion of every of us, wrong of good. We believe in free software. I don't understand your ideas here far from being a troll.
