"Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed." [http://libsf.org/licenses/libsf-gpl-v1.txt LibSF GPL]

oops my mistake, I wrongly read above lines as being the summary of the license, instead it is regarding permission of the license document itself. sorry about that,

 > Christianity *IS* at the heart of why LibSF exists.
 > We recognize that everything we have, everything
 > we are, everything we can be, that all of
 > it is a gift which comes from God, and that the
 > rock upon which we must build everything is Jesus Christ.

 > Free software, the idea of giving that which
 > you possess unto others, that they might take
 > your work and receive it, and possibly improve upon
 > it, making the end result better than you individually
 > were capable of doing alone, is the very central idea
 > of what Jesus Christ. When He came here, He gave
 > everything. Very few received Him, but it was
 > offered to all, and it was completely free.


Intelligent attempt to co·erce Free Software users into Christianity.
From the website & you ideas, its pretty clear your *main* intention is not to exclude RMS from Free Software, but a rather sinister one. You want to misguide Free Software users into thinking that by believing in Free software, they are actually believing in Christianity and hence they are Christian in that sense.

World needs to liberate itself from brainwashed ideas about God. God is God. There is no need to put a tag on God like a face or statue or cross or monument.
God does not want you to misguide people.

Being technically redundant to GNU public license, it does not have much chance to establish itself. However, You can promote it in churches to co-erce Christians into using Free Software. Other than that its pretty devilish, as non-christians who cannot look through your gimmick might turn away from Free Software thinking it will make them convert to Christanity.

Reply via email to