> No one forces them to have supported partners? This sounds fishy to > me. so what, free software is more important than feeding your kids? > I'm lost here.
Having children is in some cases a choice, childless people don't have the problem of having to feed their kids. Although this isn't the significant issue here, my main point was that selling restricted software isn't the only way to support oneself (somehow most arguments against this refer to children).
pgp6vVSEgXYkK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
