> Thank you for your insight. Observe that the FSF considers moot the > OFL's obligation to distribute a software program because a simple > "hello world" satisfies this requirement.
Yes, this causes no practical problems. (I don't know why would anyone explicitly choose such a requirement.) > Besides, I do no get your point about the "freedom to distribute > copies of your modified versions to others": a license can be both > free according to the FSF and incompatible with the GPL. It can be both, the FSF doesn't consider license incompatibility a freedom problem (unless a program cannot be distributed due to this), I see no way to avoid it in all cases. It just restricts possibly useful uses of the work not expected by the original authors.
pgp5TU3W3927d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
