The GPL actually has a not so obvious downside if one entity holds the copyright to the entire codebase - it can be used in a licensing scheme known as "open core" (see http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/10/16/open-core-shareware.html) where the copyright holder can peddle their proprietary addons because they as the copyright holder are not bound by GPL's copyleft. This is typically indicated by the presence of a free "Community Edition" and a "Pro Edition" or "Enterprise Edition" with added proprietary parts. I think this is the case with mysql, actually. These feel more like traditional proprietary companies in that the free version is meant to be demoware or crippleware.
For a project like jQuery, which was offered under either the MIT or the GPL,
the change means practically nothing, as the MIT license is compatible with
the GPL anyway.
- [Trisquel-users] jQuery 1.8 released with an interestin... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] jQuery 1.8 released with an i... ron
- Re: [Trisquel-users] jQuery 1.8 released with ... Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] jQuery 1.8 released with ... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] jQuery 1.8 released with ... adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] jQuery 1.8 released with an i... tegskywalker
