Within the quality limits of reviews in general that Chris has pointed out and the fact that they have no grasp of software freedom issues I thought the review was a favorable one. They expressed surprise at how well Trisquel works (you can do everything you want), that it is compatible with most hardware and gave it strong marks (best Gnome 3) for appearance. Given they're happy to talk about proprietary programs for GNU/Linux I'm pleased that they bust those myths at least.

It seemed to me that their criticism of this forum was derived from the fact that we won't help people to use proprietary software. They obviously see that as unhelpful. All I can say is full marks for consistent ethics everybody.

Reply via email to