В 21:15 +0100 на 01.11.2012 (чт), [email protected] написа: > It is true that a lot of JavaScript code is proprietary to the parent site, > don't lump jQuery into the same category.
Where did you read that or how did you imagined it? I've said twice I am excluding free software JavaScript libraries. I haven't even implied that jQuery bloats the browser or brings inconvenient features, which I am not claiming, because I haven't made observations and conclusions. For the rest, I am perfectly aware, but I prefer MooTools.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
