To me, this practice is the hardware equivalent to dual-licensing free/proprietary in the software world. I have never really seen an ethical problem with dual-licensing and I do not see any with hardware either. In both cases, the user is proposed solutions that fully respects her freedoms and, even if, for some lack of awareness, she chooses proprietary software, she can, at any moment, easily switch to the free solution (in the case of ThinkPenguin: all devices are optimal choices for a 100% free GNU/Linux system). If, from a business point of view, that brings more money to free software-friendly companies, this is all good. In the software, it does not seem to work well: dual licensing is less and less common. It seems to work better with hardware. :-)

Reply via email to