One huge example of this is the mainstream media on "global cooling" in the 1970s; at the time, climatologists debated over whether aerosols lowering global temperatures would have more of an effect (global dimming) or greenhouse gases raising global temperatures would have more of an effect (global warming). Mainstream media turned the hypothesis of global dimming into "scientists predict ice age!". Of course, when it turned out to be incorrect, they never owned up to this because "we misreported on global dimming, sorry!" is not a very exciting news story.
I'm not so sure about the "brain cancer" thing. I haven't done any research,
but I think I read somewhere that that's just overhyped preliminary studies.
Mainstream media often does this; it makes things sound more exciting than
they really are.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petition to re-l... anbukkuadimai
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petition to... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petition to... f3rn4nd0 . n3gr0
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petitio... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petition to... aliasbody
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petition to... jibaro
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petition to... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petition to... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] off-topic (maybe): petition to... 18396055767
