Yes, Conanical's policy might be fine. I was talking about theoretical other
policies, like Mozilla's. Also, Conanical's policy could be changed, and then
the license could be rendered effectively nonfree by that.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts Licen... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts ... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts Licen... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License ejectmail
