I wouldn't reject something GPL, just because it's called "open source", instead of "free software". If something is both free and open-source, what about the term "foss"? That would appear to eliminate confusion; maybe it's redundant, if anything free is, by necessity, open-source? In my experience, the term "free software" is often confused with "freeware", where the latter is often a crippled version of a commercial product.
- [Trisquel-users] Do you reject software labe... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do you reject soft... Dave Hunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do you reject ... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do you reject soft... Jason Self
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do you reject soft... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do you reject soft... carlostgonzalves
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do you reject ... Alexander Stephen Thomas Ross
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do you reject soft... icarolongo
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do you reject soft... nospamhere
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: Do you reject... 592783905
