OK, I'd really like to jump in here: you're saying something about an
investigation and verification or something like that because someone a few
posts ago mentioned a few programs that seem to be free. Are you actually
aware of any of them being nonfree? If you are, please say so, but there's no
need to belittle everyone else because they don't do... whatever you expect
them to do to be absolutely certain that it's all free. Really, what kind of
verification are you expecting here? All you're talking about is some vague
"investigation".
> In fact, those softwares recommended by Tegskywalker may even be free
> but did he or you even verify before making a wrong to Trisquel and
> those users that trust this list not to suggest non-free software?
You do remember that this is a public forum/mailing list, right? Of course we
should point out when someone links to nonfree software or makes a bad
suggestion, but this does not at all mean lashing out because someone *might*
have potentially made a mistake with their link or suggestion (i.e. any time
someone links to a website that isn't one of the FSF's websites). In this
case, as far as I can tell, you are seriously overreacting; someone linked to
a few PPAs and you're mad because you feel they haven't been "investigated"
or something, even though they seem to contain only free software.
