Now, on the opposite end of the spectrum, just how acceptable is it for a
license to require bundling when selling, and not allow unaccompanied
distribution for a fee? The FSF mentions this as a reason that the Code
Project Open License is non-free, but several paragraphs later they say of
the OFL "Since a simple Hello World program will satisfy the requirement, it
is harmless." Before the PT fonts were released under the OFL they had a
license that was libre in all possible respects except for a clause "You may
bundle the font with commercial software, but you may not sell the fonts by
itself [sic]. They are free."
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Canada Type, and free... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Canada Type, and... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Canada Type,... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Canada T... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Cana... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Cana... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Canada Type, and free... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Canada Type, and free... davidvargas1
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A letter from Canada Type, and free... shiretoko
