I also do not see why the reader's freedom would be attacked if the thesis could not be modified. It is not software. I am not achieving any work in reading the thesis. The thesis is a work of opinion that, I believe, should *not* be modifiable! I would therefore argue in favor of the ND clause. I personally do not see much problem in preventing commercial redistributions. In the end, and if I were you, I would choose the CC-BY-ND license but I believe that the CC-BY-NC-ND is OK as well.

Just to be clear: I *do* believe the thesis ought to be freely distributable in a non-commercial way! The reason for freedom 2 applies to anything and not only software. All Creative Common licenses respect it.

Reply via email to