My understanding was that the reason firefox was rebranded to Abroswer was
that the links to non-free extensions were considered an implicit endorsement
of non-free software. I do trust that Trisquel would use icedove or another
rebrand if the fsf was not okay with thunderbird, but could someone clear up
my confusion on what makes something acceptable to be included in a
fully-free distribution? Sorry if this is a stupid question. I actually use
thunderbird btw.
- [Trisquel-users] Why does Trisquel have thunderbird in t... christian
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does Trisquel have thunder... mikko . viinamaki
