Well, I hesitate to become a member because of the concept of the "beneficial dictator for life". I don't know quidam and he may be a nice person, but I don't think a "dictatorship" will encourage more people to join the development team or is a good idea for any other reason. Why not make community decisions? This would be the best solution for everyone. Since quidam founded the project and put much effort in it, I'm sure he want it to become a success, and for this we need decisions pleasing the majority of users with respect to a kind of "manifest".

I think of ubuntu. Same problem here. The dictatorship had disastrous consquences. I don't trust this concept.

Reply via email to