I think of ubuntu. Same problem here. The dictatorship had disastrous consquences. I don't trust this concept.
Well, I hesitate to become a member because of the concept of the "beneficial
dictator for life".
I don't know quidam and he may be a nice person, but I don't think a
"dictatorship" will encourage more people to join the development team or is
a good idea for any other reason.
Why not make community decisions? This would be the best solution for
everyone.
Since quidam founded the project and put much effort in it, I'm sure he want
it to become a success, and for this we need decisions pleasing the majority
of users with respect to a kind of "manifest".
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... gromobir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... javiparpe
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... atilio . baroni
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... veganix
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... gromobir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... gromobir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu a... vpro
