On 30/08/13 05:40, erikthorsen wrote: > Right.. Yes, I see. It's got a silly, completely unenforcable clause > in there. Heh. Suppose my immediate vaguely childish reaction is akin > to who gives a shit.. The code is still out there. You can grab it, > stare at it and modify it. > > Then again, the FSF always sees things entirely in black and white, > so guess it's hardly surprising only the OSI gave this one a > go-ahead.
Oracle is known to enforce copyrights, especially where a commercial entity is involved. Andrew.
