Now, if we do know about malware implemented in the hardware (such as vPro's treacherous computing), we can at least avoid the devices that are known to implement it... if such devices exist! Today, ThinkPenguin does not propose CPUs with vPro. However, Intel may soon stop producing CPUs without vPro. What is the solution then? I do not think that, today, the solution can be technical: we will have to convince the manufacturers to respect our freedoms.
"When something changes the functioning of the hardware and users don't know
about it", well, there is nothing that can be done against it: we all depend
on mass-produced software and, even if documentation is provided, malware
would not be described in it.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some curre... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some curre... ali
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some curre... shiretoko
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Some curr... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some current free software friendly ... stask
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some current free software friendly ... stask
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some current free software friendly ... fernando . negro
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some current free software friendly ... stask
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some current free software friendly ... stask
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Some current free software fri... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some current free software friendly ... stask
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some current free software friendly ... stask
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Some current free software friendly ... stask
