Restrictive is the right word to use, the GPL is highly restrictive, as is all copyleft me-or-nothing licenses. In v3 it goes even further, trying to prevent the so-called tivoization for instance. Not really sure what else one could call it when contrasting to the permissive, anything-goes BSD or MIT style licenes.
Sure, the premise sounds simple enough, but really, when you have a long
document riddled with lawyer speak, at times with questionable
interpretation, I think it's at least a little troublesome. But so far it's
seemed to work just fine, so I'm probably just paranoid. =x
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice lloyd
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice icarolongo
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice Pascal Diogo Antunes
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice Pascal Diogo Antunes
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice erikthorsen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice em9002
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice erikthorsen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voic... em9002
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux ... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voic... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice icarolongo
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice Sachin Dey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice simonafreeman
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice Andresmp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Voice Andresmp
