"This makes me wonder: If the project behind a distribution is able to support, develop and distribute proprietary software while at the same time redefining what constitutes their distribution so as to be considered 100% free then can't all distros do the same thing and make the same claim? Would we then not be required to accept them as being 100% free if they do these very same actions that Debian has done so as to avoid being hypocritical? Is it not becoming too easy for a distribution to say that they're 100% free?" -- http://jxself.org/debian-doubletalk.shtml
>If the Debian distro is free (and you said so yourself) the distro should be
there. With a warning about the non-free repos maybe, but the DISTRO itself
should be there!
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Simple guide to make happy a GNU us... quiliro
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Simple guide to make happy a GNU u... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Simple guide to make happy a G... gnuser
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Simple guide to make happ... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Simple guide to make h... gnuser
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Simple guide to m... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Simple guide to ma... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Simple guide to make happy a GNU us... jason
