В 21:54 +0100 на 10.12.2013 (вт), Pascal Diogo Antunes написа: > No, It's my work for school. > I have to develop an ASM program for 68k arch, but I don't have no > computer with 68k.
What about the good old GNU assembler? ;) I don't remember that I ever used it although I had some university projects back in the days with the Motorola 68Hxx series. I think it only supports 11 and 12 series. aptitude show binutils-m68hc1x |grep Description Description: binary utilities that support Motorola's 68HC11/12 targets sudo aptitude install binutils-m68hc1x dpkg -L binutils-m68hc1x |grep -- -as /usr/share/man/man1/m68hc11-as.1.gz /usr/bin/m68hc11-as /usr/bin/m68hc12-as /usr/share/man/man1/m68hc12-as.1.gz man m68hc12-as man m68hc12-as Another option might be crasm: aptitude show crasm |grep Description Description: Cross assembler for 6800/6801/6803/6502/65C02/Z80 More potential options with mixed results: apt-cache search assembler |less apt-cache search assembly |less If you find any free software that works, you would definitely want/have to test your code in your school's lab assembler and use hacks/code changes to make it work with both assemblers if you have to. Test it on real hardware if the lab has such and it is an requirement before you have to show it. I had a similar case with Microchip's PIC assembly for some university projects and I used gputils/gpasm. Making your code work for your teachers/your school's way is essential. The tradeoff is minimal in my opinion. :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
