Proprietary software developers don't like to think of it this way, but that's what proprietary software does; it forces non-freedom onto someone else. The GPL just says you can't do that.
I'm not sure if this is what you meant, but copyleft doesn't force freedom
onto someone else. A user of a GPL-licensed program can run the program the
way they don't wish, not take the source code and compile it, not
redistribute, etc. The GPL forces people to not force non-freedom onto
someone else.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me abo... superbyelich
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me abo... Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me about Ri... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me about Ri... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me abo... Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me about Ri... superbyelich
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me abo... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me about Ri... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me abo... Andrew Roffey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me about Ri... gramex
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me about Ri... LDrumbler
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me about Ri... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] One thing that bothers me about Ri... adrian . malacoda
