@GNUuser that was certainly not an attack, but an honest question (which you
chose NOT to answer). I do NOT agree with your "argument" in this case, or
the fact that you generally view so many posts as arguments (you vs.
trisquel). I am honestly, confused, as you don't seem to share the values
that are associated with the Free Software Movement and Trisquel, and your
posts generally appear (at least to me) to be a constant "attack" on the
Trisquel community and it's development. IMO (and my "opinion" only)
trisquel-forums would be a better place without your presence - but obviously
others disagree... take care.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microcode security ... george . standish
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microcode secu... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microcode ... george . standish
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microc... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor mi... george . standish
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: Intel process... simonhandel
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microcode ... stask
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microcode secu... wlqdqxvu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microcode secu... stask
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microcode ... george . standish
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor microc... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor mi... george . standish
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Intel processor mi... george . standish
