El mié 22 ene 2014 14:40:23 ECT, [email protected] escribió: > When you speak of freedom, you are referring to the 4 freedoms as > defined by the FSF right? Ok cool. The GPLs, the BSDs, MIT, Apache, > CC0, and MPL respect those and are the most popular licenses. > > These licenses respect those freedoms and can be called either free > software or open source. Its more of a choice of wording and depends > on your audience. The term free software tends to lend itself more to > evangelism and open source is a more common business term.
When they speak about open source, they convince you that you have to opensource the fat and to capture the user with the rest of the code. They talk about the software that is a differentiator. That is double morality. It is not to bring free software to business. It is to make business capture the free software movement and keep its monopolies. You better listen to Bruce Perens arguments in favor of differentiators. -- Saludos libres, Quiliro Ordóñez 600 8579
