It depends on many other bugs listed on the left side of the page.
That is pretty easy to "prove". Just find the proper bug report (opened in
2009) in chromium's issues:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28291
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firefox to have ad... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firefox to ha... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firefox t... George Standish
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firef... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on F... legimet . calc
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thou... legimet . calc
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on F... George Standish
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on F... mikko . viinamaki
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Your thoughts on ... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firefox to ha... retro
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firefox to have ad... davidvargas1
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firefox to have ad... kkpengboy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firefox to have ad... dhunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Your thoughts on Firefox to have ad... danieldelahoyde
